|
Post by burnking on Oct 8, 2008 10:57:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by The Biff Lebowski on Oct 8, 2008 11:57:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by plungerhand on Oct 8, 2008 12:06:16 GMT -5
Now that's funny^^^^
|
|
|
Post by Howie Feltersnatch on Oct 8, 2008 12:23:54 GMT -5
Dammit! I was saving myself for you and you run off with Becky?? WTF?? Oh hell, I guess it could be a threesome!! there are three kinds of threesomes involving chicks, this would be called the: "AWESOME!" threesome there is the "COOL!" threesome (2gals one dude) and the "Devil's" Threesome (2dudes one gal) that is all
|
|
|
Post by Torque on Oct 8, 2008 17:47:25 GMT -5
I don't get the appeal of BEING in a threesome really (I get the appeal of witnessing). I'm adept at multitasking but I just don't like to share.
|
|
|
Post by FUCKTARD ! on Oct 8, 2008 18:34:34 GMT -5
Dammit! I was saving myself for you and you run off with Becky?? WTF?? Oh hell, I guess it could be a threesome!! there are three kinds of threesomes involving chicks, this would be called the: "AWESOME!" threesome there is the "COOL!" threesome (2gals one dude) and the "Devil's" Threesome (2dudes one gal) that is all What about the Really Really Really Really REALLY not awesome 3 dude 3 -some? You know like you had last Friday ?
|
|
|
Post by Jo on Oct 9, 2008 12:52:40 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by elranito on Oct 9, 2008 14:00:49 GMT -5
Good pick. I'd almost consider going straight for Becky... maybe.
|
|
|
Post by Krystal on Oct 11, 2008 9:06:47 GMT -5
Shakira and kiera Knightley. But they would have to play the man.
|
|
|
Post by Howie Feltersnatch on Oct 14, 2008 11:05:13 GMT -5
What about the Really Really Really Really REALLY not awesome 3 dude 3 -some? You know like you had last Friday ? there are three kinds of threesomes involving chicks[/i], this would be called the: "AWESOME!" threesome there is the "COOL!" threesome (2gals one dude) and the "Devil's" Threesome (2dudes one gal) that is all[/quote]
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Oct 18, 2008 15:56:05 GMT -5
Youv'e got to be kidding me, I just had a hot flash
|
|
|
Post by spoonman on Oct 18, 2008 17:31:39 GMT -5
I would not go gay for anyone. Period.
|
|
|
Post by Jo on Oct 18, 2008 17:55:41 GMT -5
I would not go gay for anyone. Period. if a feller named "dishman" came along, you wouldn't run away with him? *ba dum chh*
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Oct 19, 2008 13:26:40 GMT -5
I would not go gay for anyone. Period. if a feller named "dishman" came along, you wouldn't run away with him? *ba dum chh* Becky, ladies and gentlemen. Tip your waitresses.
|
|
|
Post by fetusfacedwindbag on Oct 20, 2008 10:11:10 GMT -5
I would not go gay for anyone. Period. Spoonman demonstrating his extreme heterosexual-ness to everyone. Because everyone else who posted who they'd go gay for was completely serious.
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Oct 20, 2008 10:29:33 GMT -5
I would not go gay for anyone. Period. Spoonman demonstrating his extreme heterosexual-ness to everyone. Because everyone else who posted who they'd go gay for was completely serious. Thank God he professed his heterosexuality in here. Otherwise I would've gone through life without ever truly knowing if he enjoyed the company of other men or not.
|
|