|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 1, 2008 10:08:24 GMT -5
Let's be clear here, I don't think Bush was the only one being the ringleader. One of the conclusions reached in the report is that Colin Powell's speech had a lot of assertions that weren't supported by the intelligence available. I would rather not choose one of you painfully obvious straw mans. Do you believe the government was in on the plot, or that they knew of it beforehand and let it happen? |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 1, 2008 10:24:58 GMT -5
Let's be clear here, I don't think Bush was the only one being the ringleader. One of the conclusions reached in the report is that Colin Powell's speech had a lot of assertions that weren't supported by the intelligence available. I would rather not choose one of you painfully obvious straw mans. Do you believe the government was in on the plot, or that they knew of it beforehand and let it happen? I just read the entire thread. Sorry. You obviously don't believe the government staged 9/11. My question should've been directed to shaggy. |
|
|
|
Post by plungerhand on Jul 1, 2008 10:51:11 GMT -5
It's all about the money, people. Middle class societies don't work in the global picture. It's becoming all too clear who the "Haves" and "Have Nots" are in this country....100 points if you can guess which side we're on....
|
|
beergeek
Intern
Let's see how your taint taste
Posts: 4
|
Post by beergeek on Jul 2, 2008 13:25:21 GMT -5
I don't think Bush lied. I think there were weapons, they were moved before we got there. All agencies were reporting the same info. It wasn't just Bush saying that they had weapons. Hilary agreed with going to war as did many others. Ask that one guy who called in all but 6 in his regiment are dead. Was there something there? Ah, look whos the crappy conspirist, you have no evidence that there were any weapons at all so don't be discouraged if I disregard everything else you say here. Whereas the 9/11 truth movement, they are getting evidence and doing the experiments filtering theories so nothing rediculous gets through like the government who filter all the facts pointing to them including the physics of the buildings collapsing, covering up the truth. But too bad, everyone will know the truth soon enough and the government can't do a damn thing about it, the media can ignore them, the government can wiretap us and throw us in jail for no reason but we will perservere and undo the corruption. I ask that people stop bashing me cuz it'll only make it worse when you find that I and so many others are right. But then again,l this is the FBHW forum, eh go ahead, the radio show kicks ass. Your request has been denied. Not only do I bash you for your stupid beliefs, I hereby bash you for being a crappy speller. I am now waiting to know the truth you will soon be uncovering, and welcome the disdain of the so many others who are also right. You are a douche bag. Move to a country you think is better than this one, and issue these kinds of complaints against it, and see how far you get. Actually, calling you a douche bag is an insult to douche bags. You're really more like the little "S" curve in the sink drain that holds the contents of a douche bag, once the douche bag has been dumped into the drain. |
|
|
|
Post by The Biff Lebowski on Jul 2, 2008 13:35:15 GMT -5
I don't know that the tone of that last retort is the sort of discourse we've come to expect here.
|
|
|
|
Post by dasbow on Jul 2, 2008 13:47:28 GMT -5
I don't know that the tone of that last retort is the sort of discourse we've come to expect here. Yeah, that was way too civil. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydethespaz on Jul 3, 2008 11:26:26 GMT -5
What I want to know about 9-11 is why it went from being Osama Bin Laden to "POOF!" Now we gonna get Sadam. Granted, I'm glad we got the dooshbag but WHERE THE EFF IS BIN LADEN?!!!!
|
|
hotsauce
Bob and Tom's fake laughing
Posts: 39
|
Post by hotsauce on Jul 11, 2008 17:49:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 11, 2008 19:20:04 GMT -5
Uranium is not a WMD. ETA: This material was found 15 years ago by UN inspectors and is now being shipped out because they finally got a buyer - Canada. Here's an interesting article addressing those who would claim that the "discovery" of already-known non-weapons grade uranium means Bush was right about the existence of WMD in Iraq: openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=56D20BFAE25E43F5D0AAE8675DCBD640?diaryId=6791 |
|
|
|
Post by shaggytheclown17 on Jul 16, 2008 15:33:25 GMT -5
Haha, looks like your bullshit debunk theory was just debunked, you stupid idiot 8P But wtf dude, uranium isn't a wmd, before bush knew that they abandoned their nuclear weapons program years ago, they've switched to the enriching uranium which "may" lead to nuclear weapons. Meaning Bush lied and should be impeached and put on trial for war crimes, his stupid war was illigal. Anyone who doesn't at least contemplate the fact that they were in on the 9/11 attack are cattle for the American slaughter house. |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 16, 2008 15:36:19 GMT -5
Haha, looks like your bullshit debunk theory was just debunked, you stupid idiot 8P Shaggy, do you believe there were bombs in the buildings? |
|
|
|
Post by shaggytheclown17 on Jul 16, 2008 15:42:54 GMT -5
Yeah I think there is enough witnesses and evidence including residue and iron sphears found.
May be somthing else, but the fact is that those two planes couldn'tve brought the towers down that perfectly.
If you see the videos then you know if any damage was done to the towers it was done to the upper n near mid side, they would've fallen over damaging many buildings around them, not fallen in their own foundation causing very little or no damage.
That still doesn't explain why building 7 collapsed, no plane hit it, burning wrekage couldn't have possibly brought it down the same damn way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 16, 2008 15:44:34 GMT -5
Yeah I think there is enough witnesses and evidence including residue and iron sphears found. May be somthing else, but the fact is that those two planes couldn'tve brought the towers down that perfectly. If you see the videos then you know if any damage was done to the towers it was done to the upper n near mid side, they would've fallen over damaging many buildings around them, not fallen in their own foundation causing very little or no damage. That still doesn't explain why building 7 collapsed, no plane hit it, burning wrekage couldn't have possibly brought it down the same damn way. Curious, how old are you? How did you first come to have these beliefs regarding 9/11? |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 16, 2008 15:46:28 GMT -5
-30! WE HAVE A WINNER!
|
|
|
|
Post by shaggytheclown17 on Jul 16, 2008 15:51:07 GMT -5
Yeah I think there is enough witnesses and evidence including residue and iron sphears found. May be somthing else, but the fact is that those two planes couldn'tve brought the towers down that perfectly. If you see the videos then you know if any damage was done to the towers it was done to the upper n near mid side, they would've fallen over damaging many buildings around them, not fallen in their own foundation causing very little or no damage. That still doesn't explain why building 7 collapsed, no plane hit it, burning wrekage couldn't have possibly brought it down the same damn way. Curious, how old are you? How did you first come to have these beliefs regarding 9/11? Eh, I'm 18 but nevermind, I'm tierd of dealing with pro Bush people, they can join the army and die with all the rest of those buttholes. |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 16, 2008 15:52:30 GMT -5
Curious, how old are you? How did you first come to have these beliefs regarding 9/11? Eh, I'm 18 but nevermind, I'm tierd of dealing with pro Bush people, they can join the army and die with all the rest of those buttholes. -1 For being a anti-American bastard And for the record I dislike Bush |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 16, 2008 15:54:56 GMT -5
Curious, how old are you? How did you first come to have these beliefs regarding 9/11? Eh, I'm 18 but nevermind, I'm tierd of dealing with pro Bush people, they can join the army and die with all the rest of those buttholes. You seem a bit defensive. I've only asked you a couple questions. If you don't want to talk about this, you probably should've not started the thread. And I think you'll probably not be looked upon too fondly after calling our dead service men and women "buttholes". You stay classy. |
|
|
|
Post by speedbump on Jul 16, 2008 16:04:57 GMT -5
Yeah I think there is enough witnesses and evidence including residue and iron sphears found. May be somthing else, but the fact is that those two planes couldn'tve brought the towers down that perfectly. If you see the videos then you know if any damage was done to the towers it was done to the upper n near mid side, they would've fallen over damaging many buildings around them, not fallen in their own foundation causing very little or no damage. That still doesn't explain why building 7 collapsed, no plane hit it, burning wrekage couldn't have possibly brought it down the same damn way. Why not? It was damaged on one side, which is clearly shown in pictures. The fires burned uncontrolled for 6 or 7 hours, and the building was only supported by 3 main trusses. Firefighters lift the building because it LOOKED like it was going to collapse, where they in on the "conspiracy" to? |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 16, 2008 16:21:14 GMT -5
Yeah I think there is enough witnesses and evidence including residue and iron sphears found. May be somthing else, but the fact is that those two planes couldn'tve brought the towers down that perfectly. If you see the videos then you know if any damage was done to the towers it was done to the upper n near mid side, they would've fallen over damaging many buildings around them, not fallen in their own foundation causing very little or no damage. That still doesn't explain why building 7 collapsed, no plane hit it, burning wrekage couldn't have possibly brought it down the same damn way. Why not? It was damaged on one side, which is clearly shown in pictures. The fires burned uncontrolled for 6 or 7 hours, and the building was only supported by 3 main trusses. Firefighters lift the building because it LOOKED like it was going to collapse, where they in on the "conspiracy" to? I think he's a bit too far gone to actually try to debate this with. Hopefully he runs into a vet and has the balls to say what he said here. |
|
|
|
Post by flyersfantn on Jul 21, 2008 18:11:16 GMT -5
To the 9/11 troofers, all I have to say is this:   |
|
|
|
Post by kaboobie92 on Jul 23, 2008 14:08:42 GMT -5
Uranium is not a WMD. ETA: This material was found 15 years ago by UN inspectors and is now being shipped out because they finally got a buyer - Canada. Here's an interesting article addressing those who would claim that the "discovery" of already-known non-weapons grade uranium means Bush was right about the existence of WMD in Iraq: openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=56D20BFAE25E43F5D0AAE8675DCBD640?diaryId=6791fistor, You laugh at me saying i get news from rush, while you are reading open left? I mine as well post up some rush articles on here as evidence. Expect me to disregard that article and everything said unless you can find something from a less biased source. |
|
|
|
Post by kaboobie92 on Jul 23, 2008 14:11:28 GMT -5
Curious, how old are you? How did you first come to have these beliefs regarding 9/11? Eh, I'm 18 but nevermind, I'm tierd of dealing with pro Bush people, they can join the army and die with all the rest of those buttholes. By calling the military "buttholes" you officially deserve to be disregarded and ignored on any political thread. You obviously don't care about this country and are anti-american. |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 23, 2008 14:33:14 GMT -5
Uranium is not a WMD. ETA: This material was found 15 years ago by UN inspectors and is now being shipped out because they finally got a buyer - Canada. Here's an interesting article addressing those who would claim that the "discovery" of already-known non-weapons grade uranium means Bush was right about the existence of WMD in Iraq: openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=56D20BFAE25E43F5D0AAE8675DCBD640?diaryId=6791fistor, You laugh at me saying i get news from rush, while you are reading open left? I mine as well post up some rush articles on here as evidence. Expect me to disregard that article and everything said unless you can find something from a less biased source. I just thought the article was funny. I didn't post it to use as evidence of anything. Do I really need to point you to an article to prove that uranium is not a WMD? |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 23, 2008 14:38:58 GMT -5
fistor, You laugh at me saying i get news from rush, while you are reading open left? I mine as well post up some rush articles on here as evidence. Expect me to disregard that article and everything said unless you can find something from a less biased source. I just thought the article was funny. I didn't post it to use as evidence of anything. Do I really need to point you to an article to prove that uranium is not a WMD? Yes, you do (for him not me) |
|
|
|
Post by ratrad on Jul 23, 2008 14:48:26 GMT -5
911pressfortruth.com/You all should check this film out. It is about wives of some victims of 9/11 searching for an answer. They didn't go into it looking for conspiracy and they didn't have a political bias. They just wanted a bit of closure. What they found shocked the s out of me. I'm not saying I believe there were bombs in the buildings, but the information they discovered chilling. That information includes the "9/11 Commission", in which the people on that board (which G-Dub appointed) don't believe the all information in that publication, not too mention the strange occurrences that surround the investigation. Check it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 23, 2008 14:53:42 GMT -5
I just thought the article was funny. I didn't post it to use as evidence of anything. Do I really need to point you to an article to prove that uranium is not a WMD? Yes, you do (for him not me) To quote from the same article that was posted as "evidence" of the finding of WMDs in Iraq: |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 23, 2008 14:58:33 GMT -5
Nice Hatchet Head, stick it to them crazies!
|
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 23, 2008 15:06:00 GMT -5
911pressfortruth.com/You all should check this film out. It is about wives of some victims of 9/11 searching for an answer. They didn't go into it looking for conspiracy and they didn't have a political bias. They just wanted a bit of closure. What they found shocked the s out of me. I'm not saying I believe there were bombs in the buildings, but the information they discovered chilling. That information includes the "9/11 Commission", in which the people on that board (which G-Dub appointed) don't believe the all information in that publication, not too mention the strange occurrences that surround the investigation. Check it out. I will, when I renew my Netflix subscription. I'm guessing they uncovered the fact that there was plently of evidence of an impending attack, and we sat on our hands. Am I close? |
|
|
|
Post by jaydethespaz on Aug 1, 2008 2:05:49 GMT -5
Just want to let everyone know that I'm pretty serious about the 9/11 truth movement n I'm gonna let you guys discuss it. heres a good 9/11 truth website for anyone who deosn't know what it is- www.911truth.org/ ;D Hey why don't you watch South Park Episode 1009. It's called the mystery of the urinal duce. they will tell you the real truth on 911 you weird Mother effer! Pretty much a bunch of pissed off muslims were responsible for 911 |
|
|
|
Post by flyersfantn on Aug 21, 2008 15:57:31 GMT -5
|
|
