|
|
Post by The Biff Lebowski on Jul 30, 2008 12:58:06 GMT -5
I made a lot because this could turn into quite a show. |
|
|
|
Post by Mark the Valet on Jul 30, 2008 13:03:11 GMT -5
I, uh... Yeah, I think I'll sit this one out.  |
|
|
|
Post by kaboobie92 on Jul 30, 2008 13:03:36 GMT -5
Where is his proof that Sadaam wasn't involved? Let me guess, you got this info from the news. You’re on the internet now use effin Google and find something to prove him wrong! Here you go, www.nationalreview.com/murdock/murdock040303.aspAnd don't try telling me its a biased source either |
|
|
|
Post by kaboobie92 on Jul 30, 2008 13:04:27 GMT -5
"Also, according to the State Department's "Patterns of Global Terrorism — 2001,"released May 21, 2002, "Iraq was the only Arab-Muslim country that did not condemn the September 11 attacks against the United States." That day, an official Iraqi broadcast said America was "...reaping the fruits of [its] crimes against humanity."
Straight from that article
|
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:07:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:08:52 GMT -5
HAHA mine is a year newer than yours  |
|
|
|
Post by speedbump on Jul 30, 2008 13:13:50 GMT -5
Give him credit, at least he's TRYING (albeit, failing) to obtain proof. You've got to walk before you can run.
|
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:16:12 GMT -5
"On September the 11th, we learned that America must confront threats before they reach our shores, whether those threats come from terrorist networks or terrorist states. I'm often asked why we're in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The answer is that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat." from your friend George Bush, as he admits no connection…kind of…. www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060911-3.html |
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jul 30, 2008 13:17:11 GMT -5
I, uh... Yeah, I think I'll sit this one out. Dangit Mark, since you posted such a BIG pic, now I have to use my slider bar to get all the way across the page . . .  |
|
|
|
Post by kaboobie92 on Jul 30, 2008 13:19:30 GMT -5
i'm not trying to prove that Hussein was along with 9/11, that is irrelevant. The fact is that he was sponsoring terrorist training and terrorist activity, whether it was with Al Qaeda or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratrad on Jul 30, 2008 13:20:16 GMT -5
Are you really asking for sources to prove Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind behind 9/11 and the hijackers involved were comprised mainly of Saudi and Egyptian nationals? Where is his proof that Sadaam wasn't involved? Let me guess, you got this info from the news. It's called the 9/11 Commission. Read it. The people on this Commission were appointed by G DUB Bush. Also, Osama hated Saddam because he was a secularist. Osama felt that Saddam was no better than the US. |
|
|
|
Post by ratrad on Jul 30, 2008 13:22:43 GMT -5
i'm not trying to prove that Hussein was along with 9/11, that is irrelevant. The fact is that he was sponsoring terrorist training and terrorist activity, whether it was with Al Qaeda or not. So is Israel, North Korea, the United States, and on and on and on. So, should we invade all those countries, including ours, too? |
|
|
|
Post by Queenie on Jul 30, 2008 13:24:12 GMT -5
I heard Osama was in an American hospital in Afgannyland 2 days after 9/11. Not trying to say it's true, just saying I heard it.
|
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:25:02 GMT -5
i'm not trying to prove that Hussein was along with 9/11, that is irrelevant. The fact is that he was sponsoring terrorist training and terrorist activity, whether it was with Al Qaeda or not. So is Israel, North Korea, the United States, and on and on and on. So, should we invade all those countries, including ours, too? and Cuba |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:27:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by kaboobie92 on Jul 30, 2008 13:28:33 GMT -5
i'm not trying to prove that Hussein was along with 9/11, that is irrelevant. The fact is that he was sponsoring terrorist training and terrorist activity, whether it was with Al Qaeda or not. So is Israel, North Korea, the United States, and on and on and on. So, should we invade all those countries, including ours, too? The U.S. Government sponsors terrorism? You and your conspiracy theories. Do you just dream up these things in your sleep? |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:31:26 GMT -5
So is Israel, North Korea, the United States, and on and on and on. So, should we invade all those countries, including ours, too? The U.S. Government sponsors terrorism? You and your conspiracy theories. Do you just dream up these things in your sleep? We give Israel military equipment to use on other countries…depends on your definition of terrorism. |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:34:58 GMT -5
It’s a double edge sword for say
|
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 13:53:10 GMT -5
Chekmate  |
|
|
|
Post by ratrad on Jul 30, 2008 14:00:20 GMT -5
Chekmate Well played good sir. Well played. |
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Jul 30, 2008 15:26:03 GMT -5
where are your sources fistor? "Fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon.[79] In sharp contrast to the standard profile of suicide bombers, the hijackers were well-educated, mature adults, whose belief systems were fully formed.[80]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks Use Google for more info… Your facts here are absolutely right weinerpoopie. However that doesn't mean we're wrong. The neither the government of Saudi Arabia nor the government of the United Arab Emirates nor the government of Egypt nor any other government you mentioned sent one person to fight against or terrorize the United States and readily gave us assistance and well wishes. However we also know that there many are individuals in each of these said countries that at the very least sympathized with Saddam Husein and Osama Binladin and their retch. Saddam readily harbored these people to do his nasty bidding. |
|
|
|
Post by wienerpoopie on Jul 30, 2008 15:47:03 GMT -5
"Fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon.[79] In sharp contrast to the standard profile of suicide bombers, the hijackers were well-educated, mature adults, whose belief systems were fully formed.[80]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks Use Google for more info… Your facts here are absolutely right weinerpoopie. However that doesn't mean we're wrong. The neither the government of Saudi Arabia nor the government of the United Arab Emirates nor the government of Egypt nor any other government you mentioned sent one person to fight against or terrorize the United States and readily gave us assistance and well wishes. However we also know that there many are individuals in each of these said countries that at the very least sympathized with Saddam Husein and Osama Binladin and their retch and Saddam readily harbored these people to do his nasty bidding. I don’t believe the country of the terrorist had anything to do with 9/11 (likewise with Iraq) however Bin Laden recruited them like an anti-American football team. I can’t debate this anymore as im about to leave work…more tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 30, 2008 15:48:09 GMT -5
Are you really asking for sources to prove Osama Bin Laden was the mastermind behind 9/11 and the hijackers involved were comprised mainly of Saudi and Egyptian nationals? Where is his proof that Sadaam wasn't involved? You can't prove a negative. If you think Saddam was involved in the conspiracy to fly passenger planes into the World Trade Center, by all means try to prove it. |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 30, 2008 15:50:14 GMT -5
"Fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon.[79] In sharp contrast to the standard profile of suicide bombers, the hijackers were well-educated, mature adults, whose belief systems were fully formed.[80]" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks Use Google for more info… Your facts here are absolutely right weinerpoopie. However that doesn't mean we're wrong. The neither the government of Saudi Arabia nor the government of the United Arab Emirates nor the government of Egypt nor any other government you mentioned sent one person to fight against or terrorize the United States and readily gave us assistance and well wishes. However we also know that there many are individuals in each of these said countries that at the very least sympathized with Saddam Husein and Osama Binladin and their retch and Saddam readily harbored these people to do his nasty bidding. Could you please re-phrase this? I have no idea what you're trying to say. |
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Jul 30, 2008 16:09:35 GMT -5
Your facts here are absolutely right weinerpoopie. However that doesn't mean we're wrong. The neither the government of Saudi Arabia nor the government of the United Arab Emirates nor the government of Egypt nor any other government you mentioned sent one person to fight against or terrorize the United States and readily gave us assistance and well wishes. However we also know that there many are individuals in each of these said countries that at the very least sympathized with Saddam Husein and Osama Binladin and their retch and Saddam readily harbored these people to do his nasty bidding. Could you please re-phrase this? I have no idea what you're trying to say. I'm saying that just because the actual terrorists were from the countries listed in weiner poopies notes and not actual Iraqis, since Saddam harbored hundreds of international terrorists< he is NOT off the hook concerning 911. Actually i feel he would be very careful not too send Iraqi nationals too keep a thin veil of deny-ability. |
|
|
|
Post by Fistor on Jul 30, 2008 16:30:14 GMT -5
Could you please re-phrase this? I have no idea what you're trying to say. I'm saying that just because the actual terrorists were from the countries listed in weiner poopies notes and not actual Iraqis, since Saddam harbored hundreds of international terrorists< he is NOT off the hook concerning 911. Actually i feel he would be very careful not too send Iraqi nationals too keep a thin veil of deny-ability. But Iraq didn't harbor the 9/11 terrorists, Afghanistan did. |
|
|
|
Post by flyersfantn on Jul 30, 2008 16:54:58 GMT -5
Al-Qaeda is not based in Saudi Arabia. Bin laden has been kicked out of that country. The reason there is alot of extremism there is hatred for the Saudi Royal family and the huge number of wahhabist mosques there. Dont say that Al-Qaeda is based there, cause its factually inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Jul 30, 2008 17:22:10 GMT -5
I'm saying that just because the actual terrorists were from the countries listed in weiner poopies notes and not actual Iraqis, since Saddam harbored hundreds of international terrorists< he is NOT off the hook concerning 911. Actually i feel he would be very careful not too send Iraqi nationals too keep a thin veil of deny-ability. But Iraq didn't harbor the 9/11 terrorists, Afghanistan did. Hey Fistor they both did |
|
|
|
Post by Mad Dog on Jul 30, 2008 19:02:30 GMT -5
By the way, check out a editorial peice done in NRO by Deroy Murdock titled "Saddams Terror Ties" Its a little dated but gets to the point. I would link it but i'm not sure how.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratrad on Jul 30, 2008 19:11:16 GMT -5
By the way, check out a editorial peice done in NRO by Deroy Murdock titled "Saddams Terror Ties" Its a little dated but gets to the point. I would link it but i'm not sure how. Deroy Murdock is a hardcore conservative. Read the GD 9/11 Commission. These people were appointed and bullied by the Bush Admin and they still found no connection between Iraq and 9/11. |
|
