atheist how many here ?

[dingdongyo]

a lot of pro-religion arguments come out of how our humanity and biology is so intricate that it could not possibly be an accident. i heard an argument along the lines of "believing there is no god is like saying you can throw a bunch of pieces of an electric can opener in the air, and have it 'randomly' put itself together and function before it falls. it doesn't make any sense, that could never happen, unless someone had a hand in it. " Something like that... i think i butchered it. fix if you can.

but i don't agree with this argument. that's assuming way too many things: 1) that we had a predetermined function, 2) there was a finite number of instances for things to happen any other way, 3) that we aren't accidents, 4) that we are complicated beings (as in, maybe we are actually simple in the big picture of things) and probably a bunch of other things that i can't think of.

i think it's more like tossing a bunch of pieces of whatever in the air and expecting it to fall and function somehow, whatever it ends up being able to do. odds are still low for that, but you just keep doing it until it works. why not?

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 6:53:26 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

Jul 21, 2008 22:14:18 GMT -5 providencecrow said:

Well there are a number of ways to go with that. What created them? Is it another God, is it the same? What was his purpose for doing that then? If it was made by the christian God, why absolutely no mention of their creation in the Bible? That would be a pretty major hole in the story telling. "oh yeah you know where i created heaven and hell and the earth and man? I kinda got drunk one night and had a bunch of eff ups that i threw on another planet...but don't worry they won't bother you for a few millennium at least"

Especially if they came to us way before we had the technology to get to them, they would obviously be more advanced and civilized than us.

I mean really, i can't see how Aliens and Christianity can work in any non contradictory way.

When you are talking about our GOD please use a little more respect. We respect you, please respect us. Especially the drunk part.

Would you care to acknowledge my evolution post?

Jul 18, 2008 15:22:44 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 18, 2008 14:02:36 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

And there is no such thing as evolution. Find me some evidence, Adaptation yes, Evolution no. But its no sense in me arguing with you because I'm not going to try to convince you that what I believe is right. You will believe what you want to believe whether I talk or not. GOD is there, but if you don't look for Him, you won't find Him.

After saying something like this, I know me arguing has a 99.9% chance of futility, but I am damn well going to try.

www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32801/title/Replaying_evolution_

This is an experiment done on E-coli, over 44,000 generations. The e-coli were given a limited supply of food, but enough to survive and placed in citrate. After 31,000 generations the e-coli developed a new ability to absorb nutrients from the citrate. Since a specimen was frozen from every 500, then went back to the 20,000 generation and found that if you started with e-coli from this point, they were much more likely to develop the abiliity to absorb citrate. In the process leading to this new ability, they found that two genetic drift's occurred, and after each drift the chance that e-coli would develop the absorbing ability increased.

After seeing this, how can you not believe in Evolution? I'll remind you of the definition in case you forgot.

"In biology, evolution is the process of change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms from one generation to the next. The genes that are passed on to an organism's offspring produce the inherited traits that are the basis of evolution. Mutations in genes can produce new or altered traits in individuals, resulting in the appearance of heritable differences between organisms, but new traits also come from the transfer of genes between populations, as in migration, or between species, in horizontal gene transfer. In species that reproduce sexually, new combinations of genes are produced by genetic recombination, which can increase the variation in traits between organisms. Evolution occurs when these heritable differences become more common or rare in a population."

You'll notice that, after 31,000 generations, a major inherited trait changed from one generation to the next.

You're welcome.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 11:29:18 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 6:53:26 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

When you are talking about our GOD please use a little more respect. We respect you, please respect us. Especially the drunk part.

Would you care to acknowledge my evolution post?

Jul 18, 2008 15:22:44 GMT -5 speedbump said:

After saying something like this, I know me arguing has a 99.9% chance of futility, but I am damn well going to try.

www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/32801/title/Replaying_evolution_

This is an experiment done on E-coli, over 44,000 generations. The e-coli were given a limited supply of food, but enough to survive and placed in citrate. After 31,000 generations the e-coli developed a new ability to absorb nutrients from the citrate. Since a specimen was frozen from every 500, then went back to the 20,000 generation and found that if you started with e-coli from this point, they were much more likely to develop the abiliity to absorb citrate. In the process leading to this new ability, they found that two genetic drift's occurred, and after each drift the chance that e-coli would develop the absorbing ability increased.

After seeing this, how can you not believe in Evolution? I'll remind you of the definition in case you forgot.

"In biology, evolution is the process of change in the inherited traits of a population of organisms from one generation to the next. The genes that are passed on to an organism's offspring produce the inherited traits that are the basis of evolution. Mutations in genes can produce new or altered traits in individuals, resulting in the appearance of heritable differences between organisms, but new traits also come from the transfer of genes between populations, as in migration, or between species, in horizontal gene transfer. In species that reproduce sexually, new combinations of genes are produced by genetic recombination, which can increase the variation in traits between organisms. Evolution occurs when these heritable differences become more common or rare in a population."

You'll notice that, after 31,000 generations, a major inherited trait changed from one generation to the next.

You're welcome.

You are talking micro-evolution. From what I understand most Christians who have a problem with evolution don't believe in macro-evolution. Personally I don't think either mico-evolution or macro-evolution is contradicted by the Bible.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 11:42:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 11:29:18 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Would you care to acknowledge my evolution post?

You are talking micro-evolution. From what I understand most Christians who have a problem with evolution don't believe in macro-evolution. Personally I don't think either mico-evolution or macro-evolution is contradicted by the Bible.

He didn't specify, but I don't see how he could deny one but not the other. The only fundamental difference is the time it takes. A series of compounded micro-evolutions is what leads to macro-evolution.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 11:49:38 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 11:42:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

You are talking micro-evolution. From what I understand most Christians who have a problem with evolution don't believe in macro-evolution. Personally I don't think either mico-evolution or macro-evolution is contradicted by the Bible.

He didn't specify, but I don't see how he could deny one but not the other. The only fundamental difference is the time it takes. A series of compounded micro-evolutions is what leads to macro-evolution.

Creationalists wouldn't agree with you. I however am not one and really have never cared enough to learn their arguments well enough to throw any other thoughts out there.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 12:07:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 11:49:38 GMT -5 speedbump said:

He didn't specify, but I don't see how he could deny one but not the other. The only fundamental difference is the time it takes. A series of compounded micro-evolutions is what leads to macro-evolution.

Creationalists wouldn't agree with you. I however am not one and really have never cared enough to learn their arguments well enough to throw any other thoughts out there.

I know they wouldn't, but they're wrong, so let's not fret about that.

[kaboobie92]

Jul 22, 2008 12:07:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 11:49:38 GMT -5 speedbump said:

He didn't specify, but I don't see how he could deny one but not the other. The only fundamental difference is the time it takes. A series of compounded micro-evolutions is what leads to macro-evolution.

Creationalists wouldn't agree with you. I however am not one and really have never cared enough to learn their arguments well enough to throw any other thoughts out there.

so you are a Christian but not a creationalist? So you do not believe that GOD created the earth as it says in the Bible?

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 12:42:47 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

Jul 22, 2008 12:07:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

Creationalists wouldn't agree with you. I however am not one and really have never cared enough to learn their arguments well enough to throw any other thoughts out there.

so you are a Christian but not a creationalist? So you do not believe that GOD created the earth as it says in the Bible?

Catholics are Christians, and they accept evolution, and I think the Big Bang. The Bible is not fact, pure and simple. Do you honestly believe two people re-populated the entire planet in 5000 years, and somehow different races developed? You cannot believe the story of Noah's Ark happened, which means you could conclude that the bible is not 100% accurate and other stories are not historically factual, such as the creation story.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 12:42:47 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

Jul 22, 2008 12:07:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

Creationalists wouldn't agree with you. I however am not one and really have never cared enough to learn their arguments well enough to throw any other thoughts out there.

so you are a Christian but not a creationalist? So you do not believe that GOD created the earth as it says in the Bible?

I believe that God created the earth. There are two accounts of creation in Genesis. They both tell the story of creation differently but I think they are both accurate. In the first account God told the story as creating everything in six days, but I don't think it was necessarily six days as we know it. I think its possible that a day could have been a million years and I think God could possibly have used evolution to create the world.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 12:47:20 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 12:42:47 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

so you are a Christian but not a creationalist? So you do not believe that GOD created the earth as it says in the Bible?

Catholics are Christians, and they accept evolution, and I think the Big Bang. The Bible is not fact, pure and simple. Do you honestly believe two people re-populated the entire planet in 5000 years, and somehow different races developed? You cannot believe the story of Noah's Ark happened, which means you could conclude that the bible is not 100% accurate and other stories are not historically factual, such as the creation story.

I believe the Bible is 100% factual and accurate.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 12:53:03 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 12:47:20 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Catholics are Christians, and they accept evolution, and I think the Big Bang. The Bible is not fact, pure and simple. Do you honestly believe two people re-populated the entire planet in 5000 years, and somehow different races developed? You cannot believe the story of Noah's Ark happened, which means you could conclude that the bible is not 100% accurate and other stories are not historically factual, such as the creation story.

I believe the Bible is 100% factual and accurate.

How can you believe God used evolution, AND believe the story of Noah's Ark? Evolution does not occur at such a rapid pace as 5000 years. How could different races developed, and the Earth become repopulated? Explain yourself, sir.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 12:55:22 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 12:53:03 GMT -5 Zee said:

I believe the Bible is 100% factual and accurate.

How can you believe God used evolution, AND believe the story of Noah's Ark? Evolution does not occur at such a rapid pace as 5000 years. How could different races developed, and the Earth become repopulated? Explain yourself, sir.

I don't find the need to confine things into boxes, but I already explained that and the other things you are asking for explanation on with the exception of the flood. Yes, I believe in the flood as well. Scroll up for the other explanations.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 13:04:33 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 12:55:22 GMT -5 speedbump said:

How can you believe God used evolution, AND believe the story of Noah's Ark? Evolution does not occur at such a rapid pace as 5000 years. How could different races developed, and the Earth become repopulated? Explain yourself, sir.

I don't find the need to confine things into boxes, but I already explained that and the other things you are asking for explanation on with the exception of the flood. Yes, I believe in the flood as well. Scroll up for the other explanations.

But you didn't explain how they could both occur and not conflict. I'm sorry, but I don't accept "I don't confine things into boxes" as an explanation. They cannot work together, unless you can explain it to me.

[Queenie]

Jul 22, 2008 13:04:33 GMT -5 Zee said:

I don't find the need to confine things into boxes, but I already explained that and the other things you are asking for explanation on with the exception of the flood. Yes, I believe in the flood as well. Scroll up for the other explanations.

I believe that miracles happen to let us know that Jesus did live, was crucified and rose from the grave. Even when Jesus was walking this earth, there were numerous non-believers, thus his reasoning behind miracles. People witnessed these miracles and told others so that they might too believe. Miracles still happen for that very reason. My daughter was cured overnight from a very serious sickness. It did not happen the first time our Pastor laid hands on her, or the second, but the third time, the time that she accepted the healing. The doctors at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital had no explanation for her sudden healing. I was told it would take a year or longer when we found a course of action that worked, which we never did. Jesus, through our Pastor, did it overnight. Bless God!!

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 13:08:30 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:04:33 GMT -5 Zee said:

I don't find the need to confine things into boxes, but I already explained that and the other things you are asking for explanation on with the exception of the flood. Yes, I believe in the flood as well. Scroll up for the other explanations.

But you didn't explain how they could both occur and not conflict. I'm sorry, but I don't accept "I don't confine things into boxes" as an explanation. They cannot work together, unless you can explain it to me.

Jul 22, 2008 12:50:57 GMT -5 Zee said:

I believe that God created the earth. There are two accounts of creation in Genesis. They both tell the story of creation differently but I think they are both accurate. In the first account God told the story as creating everything in six days, but I don't think it was necessarily six days as we know it. I think its possible that a day could have been a million years and I think God could possibly have used evolution to create the world.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 13:18:14 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:08:30 GMT -5 speedbump said:

But you didn't explain how they could both occur and not conflict. I'm sorry, but I don't accept "I don't confine things into boxes" as an explanation. They cannot work together, unless you can explain it to me.

Jul 22, 2008 12:50:57 GMT -5 Zee said:

I believe that God created the earth. There are two accounts of creation in Genesis. They both tell the story of creation differently but I think they are both accurate. In the first account God told the story as creating everything in six days, but I don't think it was necessarily six days as we know it. I think its possible that a day could have been a million years and I think God could possibly have used evolution to create the world.

I want you to explain how, after only two people were left in the story of Noah's Ark, they could have repopulated the Earth and different races and cultures developed after 5000 years. You must believe that story, since you said the bible was 100% factual. I get that you believe in evolution, but this has nothing to do with that. You are avoiding my question. If you say that the story is an anecdote, then you do not believe it is 100% factual. You could believe everything it contains are "truths", but not facts.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 13:22:09 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:18:14 GMT -5 Zee said:

I want you to explain how, after only two people were left in the story of Noah's Ark, they could have repopulated the Earth and different races and cultures developed after 5000 years. You must believe that story, since you said the bible was 100% factual. I get that you believe in evolution, but this has nothing to do with that. You are avoiding my question. If you say that the story is an anecdote, then you do not believe it is 100% factual. You could believe everything it contains are "truths", but not facts.

The Bible explains that very clearly. There were not just two people but there were eight people after the flood. People lived longer back then and had a lot of children. I do believe it is 100% factual.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 13:17:25 GMT -5 Queenie said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:04:33 GMT -5 Zee said:

I don't find the need to confine things into boxes, but I already explained that and the other things you are asking for explanation on with the exception of the flood. Yes, I believe in the flood as well. Scroll up for the other explanations.

I believe that miracles happen to let us know that Jesus did live, was crucified and rose from the grave. Even when Jesus was walking this earth, there were numerous non-believers, thus his reasoning behind miracles. People witnessed these miracles and told others so that they might too believe. Miracles still happen for that very reason. My daughter was cured overnight from a very serious sickness. It did not happen the first time our Pastor laid hands on her, or the second, but the third time, the time that she accepted the healing. The doctors at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital had no explanation for her sudden healing. I was told it would take a year or longer when we found a course of action that worked, which we never did. Jesus, through our Pastor, did it overnight. Bless God!!

I agree with you 100%. I think often people overlook miracles and continue to deny God though. If a person does not acknowledge miracles then I don't think there is anything that I can do to convince them.

[Queenie]

Jul 22, 2008 13:27:50 GMT -5 Zee said:

I agree with you 100%. I think often people overlook miracles and continue to deny God though. If a person does not acknowledge miracles then I don't think there is anything that I can do to convince them.

You don't have to try and convince them Zee, He won't give up. I guarantee you there are several people in this world that once thought of themselves as atheists, but through His power of miracles, His glory now shines through them and they are believers.

[plungerhand]

5000 years ago people live in the hundreds, but 200 years ago people only lived to be 50.....hmmmmm

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 13:39:38 GMT -5 Queenie said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:27:50 GMT -5 Zee said:

I agree with you 100%. I think often people overlook miracles and continue to deny God though. If a person does not acknowledge miracles then I don't think there is anything that I can do to convince them.

You don't have to try and convince them Zee, He won't give up. I guarantee you there are several people in this world that once thought of themselves as atheists, but through His power of miracles, His glory now shines through them and they are believers.

I enjoy discussing such things because I think it is good for for me personally to organize my thoughts in regards to my beliefs. I am not so naive to think I will change anyone else opinions... I leave that to God like you were referring to. I also doubt anyone really thinks they will change mine.

[Queenie]

Jul 22, 2008 13:51:58 GMT -5 Zee said:

I enjoy discussing such things because I think it is good for for me personally to organize my thoughts in regards to my beliefs. I am not so naive to think I will change anyone else opinions... I leave that to God like you were referring to. I also doubt anyone really thinks they will change mine.

Funny thing, huh . . . yeah, and nobody will ever change my mind as well. I am, however, always up for clarification on some issues. The Pastor I was referring to that laid hands on my daughter heads up a motorcycle church and the Tennesee Motorcycle Ministries. If you get a chance sometime, look up Ron Baptiste, Covenant Confirmers Ministries.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 14:35:08 GMT -5 Queenie said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:51:58 GMT -5 Zee said:

I enjoy discussing such things because I think it is good for for me personally to organize my thoughts in regards to my beliefs. I am not so naive to think I will change anyone else opinions... I leave that to God like you were referring to. I also doubt anyone really thinks they will change mine.

Funny thing, huh . . . yeah, and nobody will ever change my mind as well. I am, however, always up for clarification on some issues. The Pastor I was referring to that laid hands on my daughter heads up a motorcycle church and the Tennesee Motorcycle Ministries. If you get a chance sometime, look up Ron Baptiste, Covenant Confirmers Ministries.

Are they connected at all to the Christian Motorcycle Association? I used to ride with the CMA weekly but I haven't been on a motorcycle in a while. Motorcycle ministries seem to be very effective.

[Queenie]

Jul 22, 2008 14:45:20 GMT -5 Zee said:

Are they connected at all to the Christian Motorcycle Association? I used to ride with the CMA weekly but I haven't been on a motorcycle in a while. Motorcycle ministries seem to be very effective.

Yes, in fact I believe Pastor Ron is their official "Chaplain"

[Queenie]

Check out this story and video . . . he is something else. I'm not sure if they tell in the story, but when you see him you will notice part of his chin missing. He had cancer as a boy and they had to remove it. I know he talks about some of his "rougher" times, but I just wanted to give you a heads up on what happened to his face, and that it did not happen as a result of those times.

www.cbn.com/700club/features/amazing/Ron_Baptiste041607.aspx

[providencecrow]

Jul 22, 2008 5:57:22 GMT -5 wingospagettio said:

My question for those that do not believe in God. Do you celebrate Christmas? Though it is now a *blech*commercial holiday, it started as a celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ. Just wondering if giving up things like that are part of the philosophy.

I do, but not as a celebration of Christ. You can call it a celebration of winter, giving, generosity, fundertastic-ness, whatever. I don't pray on christmas, i don't have an angel on my tree (i do generally get one though, lets face it those things are sweet and make the house smell awesome). I celebrate it secularly i suppose. It's not like there is anything else to do on December 25th, everything is effing closed!

Jul 22, 2008 7:00:55 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 6:53:26 GMT -5 @kaboobie92 said:

When you are talking about our GOD please use a little more respect. We respect you, please respect us. Especially the drunk part.

I'm the one that is supposed to be easily offended and I don't read what he said as being disrespectful of God. His argument was that God would have to justify not telling his followers about aliens... his statement helped explain this coming up with a hypothetical way God would explain it.

At least i wasn't the only one who couldn't see how i was being disrespectful. If i wanted to be, believe me everyone would have known. Obviously even if God had a quote with that exact intent in the bible, it would have been worded better due to a king james translation (supposedly done by Shakespeare, which is todays fun fact)

Jul 22, 2008 11:42:02 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 11:29:18 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Would you care to acknowledge my evolution post?

You are talking micro-evolution. From what I understand most Christians who have a problem with evolution don't believe in macro-evolution. Personally I don't think either mico-evolution or macro-evolution is contradicted by the Bible.

It has been a few years since i've studied biology, but at least while i was in the classes it was understood that the separation of micro and macro evolution is artificial and created by religion. Evolution only cares about natural selection and mutation. Once X population has deviated far enough from the general species population so that they can no longer produce fertile offspring, then speciation has occurred.

Jul 22, 2008 13:26:12 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:22:09 GMT -5 speedbump said:

I want you to explain how, after only two people were left in the story of Noah's Ark, they could have repopulated the Earth and different races and cultures developed after 5000 years. You must believe that story, since you said the bible was 100% factual. I get that you believe in evolution, but this has nothing to do with that. You are avoiding my question. If you say that the story is an anecdote, then you do not believe it is 100% factual. You could believe everything it contains are "truths", but not facts.

The Bible explains that very clearly. There were not just two people but there were eight people after the flood. People lived longer back then and had a lot of children. I do believe it is 100% factual.

If you want me to do the math on this, I will, but even though in the past humanity has been known for having tons and tons of children, the reason was that the majority of them didn't make it very far along in life. In order for in 5000 years the population to go from 8 to several billion, youre talking of a Zap Brannigan's dream style mating system.

The fossil record also does not show a mass near extinction of humanity 5000 years ago. But that's the easy proof against Noah's story.


And to go with the whole miracle talk, if God did want to prove to us that he can cure disease or help people through prayer, he just needs to perform one simple miracle to convince everyone: Just give one amputee a limb back.

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 18:13:16 GMT -5 providencecrow said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:26:12 GMT -5 Zee said:

The Bible explains that very clearly. There were not just two people but there were eight people after the flood. People lived longer back then and had a lot of children. I do believe it is 100% factual.

If you want me to do the math on this, I will, but even though in the past humanity has been known for having tons and tons of children, the reason was that the majority of them didn't make it very far along in life. In order for in 5000 years the population to go from 8 to several billion, youre talking of a Zap Brannigan's dream style mating system.

The fossil record also does not show a mass near extinction of humanity 5000 years ago. But that's the easy proof against Noah's story.


And to go with the whole miracle talk, if God did want to prove to us that he can cure disease or help people through prayer, he just needs to perform one simple miracle to convince everyone: Just give one amputee a limb back.

Go for it do the math... I just did. Assuming 5000 years, starting at a population of 8, ending with a population of 8 billion, that means an increase of population each year by a factor of just under 1.005. A factor of 1 would mean that there is a birth for every death. With a factor of 1.005 it would have taken 25 years to increase the over all population by 1. Obviously it grows exponentially. Sounds reasonable to me.

Your miracle part I agree. Apparently God doesn't want to prove Himself to everyone because as you said it... He could if He wanted to.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 13:26:12 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:22:09 GMT -5 speedbump said:

I want you to explain how, after only two people were left in the story of Noah's Ark, they could have repopulated the Earth and different races and cultures developed after 5000 years. You must believe that story, since you said the bible was 100% factual. I get that you believe in evolution, but this has nothing to do with that. You are avoiding my question. If you say that the story is an anecdote, then you do not believe it is 100% factual. You could believe everything it contains are "truths", but not facts.

The Bible explains that very clearly. There were not just two people but there were eight people after the flood. People lived longer back then and had a lot of children. I do believe it is 100% factual.

That doesn't explain the various races. Were the 8 people all of a different race too?

[Zee]

Jul 22, 2008 22:46:25 GMT -5 speedbump said:

Jul 22, 2008 13:26:12 GMT -5 Zee said:

The Bible explains that very clearly. There were not just two people but there were eight people after the flood. People lived longer back then and had a lot of children. I do believe it is 100% factual.

That doesn't explain the various races. Were the 8 people all of a different race too?

I don't know what races they were. The Bible does not even use the word race in reference to people... it describes them as being of "one blood." They were all part of the human race. I don't even know why that needs to be explained. The wives of Noah's sons were not from the same family as Noah and most likely had different physical features... not to mention its possible that all three sons had different physical features.

[speedbump]

Jul 22, 2008 23:12:04 GMT -5 Zee said:

Jul 22, 2008 22:46:25 GMT -5 speedbump said:

That doesn't explain the various races. Were the 8 people all of a different race too?

I don't know what races they were. The Bible does not even use the word race in reference to people... it describes them as being of "one blood." They were all part of the human race. I don't even know why that needs to be explained. The wives of Noah's sons were not from the same family as Noah and most likely had different physical features... not to mention its possible that all three sons had different physical features.

It needs to be explained because I want to know how a family of eight white people could, in 5000 years, develop into Blacks, Asians, Native americans, and hispanics, and more. I know the bible doesn't say they were all white, but since the old testament condemned people of color (the biblical verse the KKK uses to justify their actions) interracial marriages would not have been accepted.

I don't even believe you're serious at this point, but I'll keep trying. In futility.